Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] staging: wilc1000: coreconfigurator.c: remove WILC_MALLOC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On 2015년 07월 24일 09:44, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 08:55:53AM +0900, Chaehyun Lim wrote:
> >>Use kmalloc and kmalloc_array instead of WILC_MALLOC.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Chaehyun Lim <chaehyun.lim@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>---
> >>V2: Use GFP_KERNEL flag instead of GFP_ATOMIC
> >This is probably the correct thing but how did you check that we aren't
> >holding a spin_lock or in IRQ context?

Thanks for the reply Tony, but I was really just trying to see how
Chaehyun checks his patches or if they are automatically generated.

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux