On 18/07/15 16:38, Marek Vasut wrote: > On Saturday, July 18, 2015 at 02:30:40 PM, Stefan Wahren wrote: >> This patch series does some clean up in mxs-lradc and finally add the >> datasheet names for every usable channel. >> >> Changes in V2: >> - remove confusing i.MX28 specific comments >> - fix some spelling errors >> - fix up includes >> - separate channel spec for i.MX23 and i.MX28 >> >> Stefan Wahren (6): >> iio: mxs-lradc: clarify supported devices >> iio: mxs-lradc: fix some spelling errors >> iio: mxs-lradc: add missing include >> iio: mxs-lradc: remove unnecessary header includes >> iio: mxs-lradc: reorder header includes >> iio: mxs-lradc: add datasheet name for every usable channel >> >> .../bindings/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.txt | 2 +- >> drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c | 122 >> +++++++++++++------- 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) > > Entire series > > Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> Thanks for looking through these. Just to let you know, there is currently a rather extended discussion going on (as part of a suggested topic for the kernel summit) about when reviewed-by tags are appropriate. The general feeling is they must in someway indicate some substantial work. Here as a result I'd say it was appropriate for patch 6 whereas an Acked-by would be more appropriate for the cleanups (where there is nothing 'interesting'). I've left these as reviewed by for this set though! Note to all reviewers I may also start added reviewed by tags that you haven't sent if I happen to feel you made a big contribution to review of a patch, but perhaps haven't revisited later versions. I'll probably send out an email about this outside of this thread at some point to get possible wider circulation. Jonathan > > Best regards, > Marek Vasut > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
