On 07/17/15 08:51, atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > drivers/staging/Kconfig | 2 + > drivers/staging/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/staging/fpga/Kconfig | 14 ++ > drivers/staging/fpga/Makefile | 8 + > drivers/staging/fpga/fpga-mgr.c | 373 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/fpga/fpga-mgr.h | 127 +++++++++++++ > 6 files changed, 525 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/staging/fpga/Kconfig > create mode 100644 drivers/staging/fpga/Makefile > create mode 100644 drivers/staging/fpga/fpga-mgr.c > create mode 100644 include/linux/fpga/fpga-mgr.h > diff --git a/drivers/staging/fpga/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/fpga/Kconfig > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..8254ca0 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/staging/fpga/Kconfig > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ > +# > +# FPGA framework configuration > +# > + > +menu "FPGA Configuration Support" > + > +config FPGA > + bool "FPGA Configuration Framework" > + help > + Say Y here if you want support for configuring FPGAs from the > + kernel. The FPGA framework adds a FPGA manager class and FPGA > + manager drivers. > + > +endmenu Is there some good reason why this is 'bool' instead of 'tristate'? I.e., why can't it be built as a loadable module? Thanks. -- ~Randy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
