On 07/17/2015 08:21 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
Hi Tixy,
On 17/07/15 12:01, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
Use dma_get_sgtable rather than dma_common_get_sgtable so a device's
dma_ops aren't bypassed. This is essential in situations where a device
uses an IOMMU and the physical memory is not contiguous (as the common
function assumes).
Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@xxxxxxxxxx>
The lack of obvious users of this code makes it hard to tell if "dev"
hereis always the right, real, device pointer and never null or some
dummy device with the wrong dma_ops, but the rest of the calls in this
file are to the proper DMA API interface so at least this patch definitely
makes things less wrong in that respect.
Ion currently lacks any standard way to set up heaps and associate a device
with a heap. This means it's basically a free for all for what devices get
associated (getting something mainlined might help...). I agree that using
the proper DMA APIs is a step in the right direction.
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
---
This also begs the question as to what happens if the memory region _is_
contiguous but is in highmem or an ioremapped region. Should a device
always provide dma_ops for that case? Because I believe the current
implementation of dma_common_get_sgtable won't work for those as it uses
virt_to_page.
I see that this point has been raised before [1] by Zeng Tao, and I
myself have been given a different fix to apply to a Linaro kernel tree.
However, both solutions looked wrong to me as they treat a dma_addr_t as
a physical address, so should at least be using dma_to_phys.
So, should we fix dma_common_get_sgtable or mandate that the device
has dma_ops? The latter seems to be implied by the commit message which
introduced the function:
This patch provides a generic implementation based on
virt_to_page() call. Architectures which require more
sophisticated translation might provide their own get_sgtable()
methods.
Given that we're largely here due to having poked this on arm64 systems,
I'm inclined to think that implementing our own get_sgtable as per arch/arm
is the right course of action. Since a lot of architectures using
dma_common_get_sgtable don't even implement dma_to_phys, I don't think it
would be right to try complicating the common code for a case that seems to
be all but common. I can spin an arm64 patch if you like.
This would be hit on any system that has non-coherent DMA or highmem. I'm
not sure I agree this isn't a common case. How many of the other
architectures are actually using the dma_get_sgtable and would have the
potential to find a problem?
Thanks,
Laura
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
