On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 08:14:08AM +0900, Chaehyun Lim wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 6:16 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:48:41AM +0900, Chaehyun Lim wrote:
> >> Remove WILC_ERRORREPORT macro. If memory allocation is failed,
> >> jump to a label to return this function with WILC_NO_MEM.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chaehyun Lim <chaehyun.lim@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/staging/wilc1000/host_interface.c | 7 +++++--
> >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/host_interface.c b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/host_interface.c
> >> index ca97b70..f6ba7d1 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/host_interface.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/host_interface.c
> >> @@ -7142,8 +7142,11 @@ s32 host_int_add_beacon(WILC_WFIDrvHandle hWFIDrv, u32 u32Interval,
> >> /* Bug 4599 : if tail length = 0 skip allocating & copying */
> >> if (u32TailLen > 0) {
> >> pstrSetBeaconParam->pu8Tail = (u8 *)WILC_MALLOC(u32TailLen);
> >> - if (pstrSetBeaconParam->pu8Tail == NULL)
> >> - WILC_ERRORREPORT(s32Error, WILC_NO_MEM);
> >> + if (pstrSetBeaconParam->pu8Tail == NULL) {
> >> + PRINT_ER("Failed to allocate memory\n");
> >
> > This message is redundant, the core already just told the user this, so
> > it's not needed to tell them this again.
> >
> > And as an aside, the mess in WILC_MALLOC() needs to go as well, that's
> > horrid, and wrong :(
>
> Thank you for your comment. You think WILC_MALLOC() should be changed.
> Could you give me a direction how this function should be changed?
Hm, let me turn the question around, why do you think it should be there
at all?
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
