On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Sorry about the *really* late reply, loads of emails some how missed my > periodic search of the mailing list. > > I'm happy with the addition of DMA, just not sure whether it's worth adding > an extra device file just to handle DMA. Could the user space application > not just use the control device? That would require an additional ioctl field for DMA channel id in case we want to support both DMA channels on tsi148. It would make sense to save that device minor if Documentation/devices.txt was good. But it has only 4 slave and 4 master windows whereas we would want to make some parameters for vme_user to configure this allocation numbers up to 8 slaves and 8 masters. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
