On Wednesday 01 July 2015 01:32 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 01:06:48PM +0530, Sohny Thomas wrote: > <snip> >>> No, now this will introduce a new checkpatch warning that "else is not >>> required after return". why did you introduce this "else"? >> I did this so that the code is more readable and understandable, I >> checked and checkpatch didn't call this out , so its clean. >> >> Otherwise the above code looks like this >> >> if(i) >> return 1; >> return 0; > you should update your tree. virtpci folder has been deleted from > unisys driver. > As you are using an old tree, maybe that explains why checkpatch is not > giving the error. This is from linux-stable branch and I updated it just yesterday, so looks like the folders still there > > regards > sudip > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
