>Yeah. You're right. Doing a vmalloc() when kmalloc() doesn't have even >a tiny sliver of RAM isn't going to work. It's easier to use >libcfs_kvzalloc() everywhere, but it's probably the wrong thing. The original reason we have the vmalloc water mark wasn't so much the issue of memory exhaustion but to handle the case of memory fragmentation. Some sites had after a extended period of time started to see failures of allocating even 32K using kmalloc. In our latest development branch we moved away from using a water mark to always try kmalloc first and if it fails then we try vmalloc. At ORNL we ran into severe performance issues when we entered vmalloc territory. It has been discussed before on what might replace vmalloc handling in the case of kmalloc fails but no solution has been worked out. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
