On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 04:23:23PM +0000, Gujulan Elango, Hari Prasath (H.) wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:49:24AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 01:13:58PM +0000, Gujulan Elango, Hari Prasath (H.) wrote: > > > From: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango <hgujulan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > This patch removes ununsed variable 'len' > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango <hgujulan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > This doesn't work because it's not in the same thread as the original > > email. You need to use the --in-reply-to option or Greg will not be > > able to find it. > > > > regards, > > dan carpenter > > > > Thanks Dan,Ok I use mutt. I will have to figure out how to get this done > using Mutt. in mutt you will have an option "in-reply-to", you need to use that. just for example, see https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/23/265 this v3 i sent at a later date using reference of the previous patch, and it went as a reply to the previous patch. >Also,if any one patch is being dropped,should i resend the > entire patch set as the numbers will differ. I think no need to send the entire series, you can just reply to that patch requesting that particular patch to be dropped. But you should test properly that dropping that patch will not affect the remaining patches of the series. regards sudip _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
