On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 07:06:49PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 03:02:37PM +0200, Peter Karlsson wrote:
> > On 2015-06-22 06:29, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > which tree have you been using?
> > > Greg will have three staging tree, use staging-testing
> >
> > I have used linux-next tree :/
> well, I am now confused why linux-next is not having this struct.
> at line 415 of drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_debug.c
> struct timeval tv; is there in staging-next. And today's linux-next
> has merged staging-next. Then how that struct timeval is not there in
> linux-next ?
I was doing a bisect to see why the files are differing in staging-next
and linux-next. And it turns out to be:
8b37bf430656 ("staging: ft1000: Replace timeval and time_t with time64_t")
which didn't go through the staging tree.
regards
sudip
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
