[PATCH 02/12] staging: lustre: fld: Use !x to check for kzalloc failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



!x is more normal for kzalloc failure in the kernel.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@@
expression x;
statement S1, S2;
@@

x = kzalloc(...);
if (
- x == NULL
+ !x
 ) S1 else S2
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx>

---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_cache.c   |    2 +-
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_request.c |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -u -p a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_request.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_request.c
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_request.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_request.c
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ int fld_client_add_target(struct lu_clie
 			fld->lcf_name, name, tar->ft_idx);
 
 	target = kzalloc(sizeof(*target), GFP_NOFS);
-	if (target == NULL)
+	if (!target)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	spin_lock(&fld->lcf_lock);
diff -u -p a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_cache.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_cache.c
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_cache.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/fld/fld_cache.c
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ struct fld_cache *fld_cache_init(const c
 	LASSERT(cache_threshold < cache_size);
 
 	cache = kzalloc(sizeof(*cache), GFP_NOFS);
-	if (cache == NULL)
+	if (!cache)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache->fci_entries_head);

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux