On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:01:22PM +0000, Jose Rivera wrote: > Greg, > > Thanks for your feedback. It is our fault that we did not articulate > clearly our intent with this patch series. First, for reference, let > us summarize here the patches in question: > > Patch 1: MC bus IRQ support > Patch 2: add device binding path 'driver_override' > Patch 3: Propagate driver_override for a child DPRC's children > Patch 4: Upgraded MC bus driver to match MC fw 7.0.0 > Patch 5: Allow the MC bus driver to run without GIC support > Patch 6: Add locking to serialize mc_send_command() calls > Patch 7: Use DPMCP IRQ and completion var to wait for MC > > With the exception of patches 2 and 3 (needed for vfio), our intent with > the rest was to make to changes to work towards completing the "Add at > least one device driver for a DPAA2 object" on the TODO list. ah, missed that item, my fault. > Before sending further patches we will submit an update to the TODO list > to provide more detail and visibility into our plan to complete the > "Add at least one device driver..." item. It's too broad as written. > In particular, we think interrupt support is required and a pre-requisite. Ok, that sounds good, please do. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
