On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 05:04:28AM +0300, Dmitry Kalinkin wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:31 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 04:09:19PM +0300, Dmitry Kalinkin wrote: > >> Also, there are some patches that IMO don't need any special VME > >> subsystem expertise, namely: > >> Documentation: mention vme_master_mmap() in VME API > >> vme: ca91cx42: return error code on DMA error > >> staging: vme_user: remove unused counters > >> staging: vme_user: remove forward declarations > >> staging: vme_user: remove open/release > >> staging: vme_user: remove buf_unalloc helper > >> vme: tsi148: depend on HAS_DMA for Kconfig > > > > I've taken all of these except patches 12, 13, 14 and 16. > > > I thought 12 was the most harmless out of the whole set. Am I wrong? You added a new userspace api, that someone else is going to have to maintain, that's not "harmless" at all. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
