On Thursday 11 June 2015 08:06 PM, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:14:49AM +0000, Abdul, Hussain (H.) wrote:
>> This patch add IRQF_ONESHOT flag in threaded IRQs request without a primary handler.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Abdul Hussain <habdul@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c b/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
>> index 0f524bb..7caaae0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
>> @@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ static int synaptics_rmi4_probe
>> rmi4_data->number_of_interrupt_register);
>> retval = request_threaded_irq(client->irq, NULL,
>> synaptics_rmi4_irq,
>> - platformdata->irq_type,
>> + platformdata->irq_type | IRQF_ONESHOT,
>> DRIVER_NAME, rmi4_data);
>> if (retval) {
>> dev_err(&client->dev, "Unable to get attn irq %d\n",
> Have you tested this? This changes the behavior of the code, right?
>
Greg,
I haven't tested this changes. Yes, this will change the behavior of the code.
Thanks
Abdul
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
