On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Are you sure all of these are correct? The kernel/user api for lustre > is a complex beast, and just casting away the pointer types isn't > usually the proper thing to do in order to resolve the issues here. > > thanks, > > greg k-h I'm not 100% sure, but the pointers that I added the annotation to end up being used as user memory. (eg. passed to copy_to_user, etc.) Sometimes these pointers are passed to functions that already have __user annotation in their signatures (eg. ll_getname, copy_and_ioctl, ll_fid2path, etc.). _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
