On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:11:37AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > I mean, yes, it doesn't seem to make much sense to continue polling > after all the hardware has been removed. The problem is that we pass a > pci_dev pointer to dgap_remove_one() and it ignores it and removes > everything. > > Otherwise, I would probably suggest that it start polling when the first > hardware is probed and stop when all the hardware is removed. > > Also this driver has active maintainers but somehow we have CC'd the > ATMEL people who maintain a different staging driver... That was a mistake on my part.I was sending patches to the wilc1000 driver and thats how atmel guys were CC'd by mistake.Thanks Dan for pointing this out and thanks sudip for copying the correct maintainers. I will take some time to go through the code/review comments and send out another version. Thanks & Regards, Hari Prasath _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
