On 04.06.2015 08:06, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 07:50:07AM +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote: >> On 04.06.2015 07:18, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 08:21:02PM +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote: >>>> On 03.06.2015 09:26, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 10:48:11PM +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote: >>>> >>>> No, I missed that - this one should also be removed - probably because of similar naming (DbgMode, dbg_mode). >>>> Thanks for finding it - I'll fix that in v2. >>>> >>>> Apart from that - did you had time/courage to analyze rest of the patches (so I can send v2)? >>> >>> at a first glance looked ok to me. I hope you have checked it on the >>> hardware as well. but maybe Dan can find something. >>> better send v2. >> >> Of course I have checked it, although - as I wrote in past - this driver has not very good performance. > is there any other driver which has better performance on this hardware > than this driver? and how are you measuring the performance? What I meant is that this driver (at least on my HW/SW configuration) is not very reliable. It drops a lot of packages and transmission speed is far from declared. But - as far as I checked - it's not due to my changes (I checked that some time ago). Perhaps my hardware has some issues - I have to buy another rtl8192e card and/or test on Windows to be sure (will do both steps probably). As for measurement, I have simple tests on my home network (WPA2/CCMP): - Scan available networks - Download 1MB file, check md5 - Ping router/gateway Regards, Mateusz _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
