The second patch is better (it also keeps the lock locked shorter.) Do
I need to resend?
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:42 PM, Sudip Mukherjee
<sudipm.mukherjee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 12:57:20PM -0700, Tolga Ceylan wrote:
>> In llog_cat_new_log(), sparse emits a context imbalance (unexpected lock)
>> warning due its inability to detect the noreturn attribute in
>> lbug_with_lock() function inside LBUG macro. Adding a never reached
>> return statement suppresses this warning.
> but adding a statement which never executes, is that the correct solution?
> what about :
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/llog_cat.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/llog_cat.c
> index c8f6ab0..1cb3495 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/llog_cat.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/llog_cat.c
> @@ -103,13 +103,12 @@ static int llog_cat_new_log(const struct lu_env *env,
>
> spin_lock(&loghandle->lgh_hdr_lock);
> llh->llh_count++;
> - if (ext2_set_bit(index, llh->llh_bitmap)) {
> - CERROR("argh, index %u already set in log bitmap?\n",
> - index);
> - spin_unlock(&loghandle->lgh_hdr_lock);
> + rc = ext2_set_bit(index, llh->llh_bitmap);
> + spin_unlock(&loghandle->lgh_hdr_lock);
> + if (rc) {
> + CERROR("argh, index %u already set in log bitmap?\n", index);
> LBUG(); /* should never happen */
> }
> - spin_unlock(&loghandle->lgh_hdr_lock);
>
> cathandle->lgh_last_idx = index;
> llh->llh_tail.lrt_index = index;
>
>
> regards
> sudip
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
