On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 10:08:19AM +0200, pmarzo wrote: > On mar, 2015-06-02 at 14:21 +0900, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 12:19:12AM +0200, pmarzo wrote: > > > On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 10:39 +0900, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 02:25:18AM +0200, Pedro Marzo Perez wrote: > > > > > Remove two lines at ieee80211_wep_null which checkpatch.pl reported as errors. > > > > > The first one because it has a C99 comment style and the second one because it is a void > > > > > return which is useless. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pedro Marzo Perez <marzo.pedro@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt_wep.c | 2 -- > > > > > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt_wep.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt_wep.c > > > > > index bd789d1..94622cc 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt_wep.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt_wep.c > > > > > @@ -279,6 +279,4 @@ void __exit ieee80211_crypto_wep_exit(void) > > > > > > > > > > void ieee80211_wep_null(void) > > > > > { > > > > > -// printk("============>%s()\n", __func__); > > > > > - return; > > > > > } > > > > > > > > Please just delete the function. > > > > > > It is not so easy, the function is exported at file > > > drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211.h and used at > > > drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_module.c line 179 with > > > several other "null" functions, it seems a dirty trick to force module > > > loading: > > > /* These function were added to load crypte module autoly */ > > > ieee80211_tkip_null(); > > > ieee80211_wep_null(); > > > ieee80211_ccmp_null(); > > > > > > I guess all this stuff should be rewritten to force the autoload > > > properly but I don't have the knowledge to fix all this. > > > Sorry Greg :-( > > > > Ugh, that's a mess. Ok, I'll take this patch again, please resend it. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > > > Ok, no problem, just not sure what do I have to resend. > > Should I resend the whole serie of three patches 1/3 2/3 3/3? > I received an e-mail confirming the acceptance of patch 3/3 on your > staging tree, no news about patch 1/3 yet, so it may confuse you if I > resend all of them. Resend whatever I have not yet applied. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel