On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 11:37:49PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > Allocate ring buffer memory from the NUMA node assigned to the channel. But you do more than just that. If there's a failure, you fall-back to the old allocation method. Why not mention that as well? And is that what you really want? Do we ever fail allocation for a node but still have memory from another one? Shouldn't the logic be in the allocator and not be forced to be in every caller? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
