On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 01:32:23AM +0200, Pedro Marzo Perez wrote:
> Removed two lines at ieee80211_wep_null which checkpatch.pl reported as errors.
> The first one because it has a C99 comment style and the second one because it is a void
> return which is useless.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pedro Marzo Perez <marzo.pedro@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt_wep.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt_wep.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt_wep.c
> index 388ed3c..2ce7b54 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt_wep.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt_wep.c
> @@ -289,6 +289,4 @@ void __exit ieee80211_crypto_wep_exit(void)
>
> void ieee80211_wep_null(void)
> {
> -// printk("============>%s()\n", __func__);
> - return;
> }
You now have a function that does nothing, why not just delete it
entirely?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
