tolga ceylan <tolga.ceylan@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 05/15/2015 09:22 PM, Tolga Ceylan wrote:
>> visorchipset_file_init() and visorchipset_file_cleanup() functions
>> do not seem to be used from anywhere else and now are declared
>> as static. Sparse emitted "not declared" warnings for these two
>> functions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tolga Ceylan <tolga.ceylan@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c
>> index ca22f49..66ae3d0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c
>> @@ -2351,7 +2351,7 @@ static const struct file_operations visorchipset_fops = {
>> .mmap = visorchipset_mmap,
>> };
>>
>> -int
>> +static int
>> visorchipset_file_init(dev_t major_dev, struct visorchannel **controlvm_channel)
>> {
>> int rc = 0;
>> @@ -2460,7 +2460,7 @@ cleanup:
>> return rc;
>> }
>>
>> -void
>> +static void
>> visorchipset_file_cleanup(dev_t major_dev)
>> {
>> if (file_cdev.ops)
>>
>
> I haven't received a response for this patch. Just checking back.
>
> Regards,
> Tolga Ceylan
I don't think there is anything wrong with your patch. However, there is
a lot of active development going to clean up the code in the unisys
tree right now, and your patch conflicts with that. I would prefer to
hold off with this for now, until it settles down a bit.
Cheers,
Jes
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
