Hm, that's unfortunate - but my own fault for lack of proper etiquette. I'll give this a week or two to settle, and build up patches against other parts of lustre in the meantime. BTW, you keep mentioning a v5 that I sent. Where is that, exactly? The last round of patches I sent I've kept labeled as "PATCH v4", and I only hit git send-email once. Could you forward me something from this v5 series, so I could see if anything is amiss on my end? -- Mike Shuey On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 6:14 AM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We would have applied the v3 patchset but now I don't know because we're > up to v5. We can't apply v5 because there are problems with it. No > one responded to v3 so Greg still might apply it or he might find these > email threads too scrambled and delete everything and ask for a resend. > > It's pretty messed up so just wait for Greg to get to it before sending > more patches? > > Basically you should only send patches which you assume will be applied. > If no one responds after 3 days then probably that means everyone from > the peanut gallery (Me, Sudip, Joe, the lustre devs), we don't have an > issue. Then Greg does the last review (2-3 weeks later perhaps). But > if it makes it past all the other reviews then generally Greg also will > be ok with it. > > Greg applies patches in first come, first applied order. If they don't > apply then you have to redo it. He doesn't invest a lot of time into > figuring out why. So you have to coordinate with the other devs, it's > up to you how you do that. > > regards, > dan carpenter > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
