Re: [PATCH v4 10/13] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: checkpatch.pl fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On May 22, 2015, at 8:18 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>>> I wonder what is more clear about that in your opinion ve
>>>> lustre_error/lustre_debug?
>>> 
>>> The fact that you have to explain this shows that it's
>>> at least misleading unless you completely understand the
>>> code.
>> 
>> Or you know, you might take the function name at the face value
>> and assume that CERROR means it's an error and CDEBUG means it's a debug message?
> 
> Maybe, but I think that it'd be better if the mechanism
> it uses was more plainly named something like lustre_log.

While the idea seems good, the biggest obstacle here is such that
there's already a thing called lustre log (llog for short too) -
it's kind of a distributed journal of operations.

Its there a different synonym, I wonder?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux