On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 07:18:42PM +0200, Alex Dowad wrote:
>> This fixes a checkpatch style error in vpfe_buffer_queue_setup.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Dowad <alexinbeijing@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/vpfe_video.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/vpfe_video.c b/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/vpfe_video.c
>> index 06d48d5..04a687c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/vpfe_video.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/vpfe_video.c
>> @@ -1095,7 +1095,7 @@ vpfe_buffer_queue_setup(struct vb2_queue *vq, const struct v4l2_format *fmt,
>> size = video->fmt.fmt.pix.sizeimage;
>>
>> if (vpfe_dev->video_limit) {
>> - while (size * *nbuffers > vpfe_dev->video_limit)
>> + while (size * (*nbuffers) > vpfe_dev->video_limit)
>> (*nbuffers)--;
>> }
>> if (pipe->state == VPFE_PIPELINE_STREAM_CONTINUOUS) {
>
> Style issue aside, is there a reason not to use
>
> if (size * *nbuffers > vpfe_dev->video_limit)
> *nbuffers = vpfe_dev->video_limit / size;
>
> instead?
>
I would prefer this.
Cheers,
--Prabhakar Lad
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
