On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 11:01:19PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 09:51:35AM -0500, German Rivera wrote: > > I'll remove the nested #ifdef. However, as I explained before, these > > #ifdefs are needed to be able to make the code compile without the > > GIC-ITS support in place. Of course, the code will not be moved out > > of staging with these #ifdefs. There is already an item for this in > > the drivers/staging/fsl-mc/TODO file. > > Heh. This is a sort of amusing miscommunication. > > I'm saying delete the dead code inside the ifdefs as well. Obviously > don't send code that can't compile. :P Btw, it's really easy to > commit parts of a file in git citool. Just highlight, right click and > select "add lines to commit". > > Although if Greg wants to allow these ifdefs in, then my feelings will > not be hurt and I am fine with that. Nope, in fact, I don't want to see any new code added here for this subsystem that isn't "correct". Just because the code is in staging doesn't mean you get to add stuff that doesn't follow the rest of the kernel's normal rules. I want to see the existing code fixed up and moved _out_ of staging first, before adding a bunch of new stuff here. Please don't just add to the TODO list, like you are doing with this series, that's not ok. greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
