Hello! On May 2, 2015, at 4:14 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 09:13:11PM +0000, Drokin, Oleg wrote: >>>> The patch was submitted. >>>> But it depends on a symbol that's not exported. >>>> I was not able to change that. >>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg83997.html >>> >>> But you were given a hint on how to change that :) >> >> Well, the hint amounted to "don't do vmalloc if you cannot live with the >> GFP_KERNEL" allocations. >> > > Which email is that? Ah, my memory is playing tricks, it appears. There was just a pointer to the "other discussions" where this advice was given it appears. > I only see where David says to implement vmalloc_node_gfp() and the talk > was about if that makes sense from a style perspective and then dies. > > Anyway, this only seems to affect ptlrpc_alloc_rqbd() since I think > that's the only place which calls OBD_CPT_ALLOC_PTR(). The rest can use > __vmalloc(). I guess so. Bye, Oleg _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
