Summarize OBD_CPT_ALLOC_GFP, OBD_CPT_ALLOC, and OBD_CPT_ALLOC_PTR as a
function, obd_cpt_alloc.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx>
---
Some questions: Is the name OK? Is the NULL test needed? If not, should
the call to kzalloc_node with the call to cfs_cpt_spread_node just be
inlined into the call sites?
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/obd_support.h | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/obd_support.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/obd_support.h
index 2991d2e..3d380f0 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/obd_support.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/obd_support.h
@@ -655,6 +655,15 @@ do { \
#define OBD_CPT_ALLOC_PTR(ptr, cptab, cpt) \
OBD_CPT_ALLOC(ptr, cptab, cpt, sizeof(*(ptr)))
+static inline void *obd_cpt_alloc(struct cfs_cpt_table *cptab, int cpt,
+ size_t size, gfp_t flags)
+{
+ return (cptab) == NULL ?
+ kzalloc(size, flags) :
+ kzalloc_node(size, flags, cfs_cpt_spread_node(cptab, cpt));
+}
+
+
# define __OBD_VMALLOC_VEROBSE(ptr, cptab, cpt, size) \
do { \
(ptr) = cptab == NULL ? \
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
