Re: [PATCH] Staging: i2o: fixed various code style issues in i2o_block.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 10:12:14PM +0200, Yorick Rommers wrote:
> From: Yorick <yorick-rommers@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Don't include a From: unless you are sending a patch someone else wrote.
Otherwise we prefer to get it from your email From.  Also you forgot
your last name.

> @@ -488,8 +488,8 @@ static int i2o_block_reply(struct i2o_controller *c, u32 m,
>  		 *      Don't stick a supertrak100 into cache aggressive modes
>  		 */
>  
> -		osm_err("TID %03x error status: 0x%02x, detailed status: "
> -			"0x%04x\n", (le32_to_cpu(msg->u.head[1]) >> 12 & 0xfff),
> +		osm_err("TID %03x error status: 0x%02x, detailed status: 0x%04x\n",
> +      (le32_to_cpu(msg->u.head[1]) >> 12 & 0xfff),
>  			status >> 24, status & 0xffff);

The new indenting is wrong.

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux