Use the --in-reply-to option. There were no responses to the first version of this email so Greg is going to apply that one. (I guess it's still possible that someone will reply to it now, I suppose). > --- > Changes since v1: > - Replaces GFP_ATOMIC by GFP_KERNEL since no lock is taken before calling > this function This information about the locking should go in the commit message and not under the cut-off. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
