Re: [PATCH V2 2/3 net-next] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Fix a bug in the signalling logic with kick_q

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:04 AM, K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
When the caller specifies that signalling should be deferred, we need to address the case where we are not able to place the current packet because the buffer is full. In this case, we will signal the host as some packets
may have been placed on the ring buffer.
I would like to thank Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> for pointing
out this issue.

Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/hv/channel.c |   32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hv/channel.c b/drivers/hv/channel.c
index e58cdb7..ae06ba9 100644
--- a/drivers/hv/channel.c
+++ b/drivers/hv/channel.c
@@ -614,8 +614,24 @@ int vmbus_sendpacket_ctl(struct vmbus_channel *channel, void *buffer, ret = hv_ringbuffer_write(&channel->outbound, bufferlist, 3, &signal); + /*
+	 * Here is the logic for signalling the host:
+	 * 1. If the host is already draining the ringbuffer,
+	 *    don't signal. This is indicated by the parameter
+	 *    "signal".
+	 *
+	 * 2. If we are not able to write, signal if kick_q is false.
+	 *    kick_q being false indicates that we may have placed zero or
+	 *    more packets with more packets to come. We will signal in
+	 *    this case even if potentially we may have not placed any
+	 *    packet. This is a rare enough condition that it should not
+	 *    matter.
+	 */
+
 	if ((ret == 0) && kick_q && signal)
 		vmbus_setevent(channel);
+	else if ((ret != 0) && !kick_q)
+		vmbus_setevent(channel);
return ret;
 }
@@ -705,8 +721,24 @@ int vmbus_sendpacket_pagebuffer_ctl(struct vmbus_channel *channel, ret = hv_ringbuffer_write(&channel->outbound, bufferlist, 3, &signal); + /*
+	 * Here is the logic for signalling the host:
+	 * 1. If the host is already draining the ringbuffer,
+	 *    don't signal. This is indicated by the parameter
+	 *    "signal".
+	 *
+	 * 2. If we are not able to write, signal if kick_q is false.
+	 *    kick_q being false indicates that we may have placed zero or
+	 *    more packets with more packets to come. We will signal in
+	 *    this case even if potentially we may have not placed any
+	 *    packet. This is a rare enough condition that it should not
+	 *    matter.
+	 */
+
 	if ((ret == 0) && kick_q && signal)
 		vmbus_setevent(channel);
+	else if ((ret != 0) && !kick_q)
+		vmbus_setevent(channel);
return ret;
 }
--

Looks like we need to kick unconditionally here. Consider we may get -EAGAIN when we want to send the last skb (kick_q is true) from the list. We need kick host in this case.

Btw, another method is let the driver to decide e.g exporting the vmbus_setevent() and call it in netvsc_start_xmit().




_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux