On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:58:42PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:17:54PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:11:00PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:46:55PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > > we were getting build warnings about assignment of incompatible > <snip> > > > > > > That's a nice cleanup, but it's not even the correct cleanup. > > > > Oops, sorry, it is the correct cleanup, I was looking at the '*' > > placement, not the const part. > > > > but the patch needs to be redone, I'll just go fix up the build warnings > > for now... > > thanks Greg for your patience and time to redo this patch. I saw you > broke it into two - three different patches. > But just one doubt, was your compiler showing any warning for the > patch - "Staging: sm750fb: provide error path for > hw_sm750le_setBLANK()" , commit id - > e74ac550298ec4635cc32e99f966568a808fd370 . my compiler didnot show > any warning for that. > mine is gcc 4.7.3, is it time to update? Yes it is, that's a really old version of gcc. Also please wrap your email lines at 72 columns :) > thanks again, and sorry that you had to do fix this. I should have > made the patches in a more proper way. Not a problem, it's part of the learning process. greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
