On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 03:40:11AM +0100, Salah Triki wrote: > This fixes the following checkpatch.pl warnings: > WARNING: Macros with flow control statements should be avoided. > > Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.triki@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_sysfs.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_sysfs.c b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_sysfs.c > index 2fd34ca..8e9eca4 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_sysfs.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_sysfs.c > @@ -106,18 +106,19 @@ void dgnc_remove_driver_sysfiles(struct pci_driver *dgnc_driver) > } > > > -#define DGNC_VERIFY_BOARD(p, bd) \ > - do { \ > - if (!p) \ > - return 0; \ > - \ > - bd = dev_get_drvdata(p); \ > - if (!bd || bd->magic != DGNC_BOARD_MAGIC) \ > - return 0; \ > - if (bd->state != BOARD_READY) \ > - return 0; \ > - } while (0) > +static int dgnc_verify_board(struct device *p, struct dgnc_board *bd) > +{ > + if (!p) > + return -1; Don't make up random error values. How can p ever be NULL? > > + bd = dev_get_drvdata(p); > + if (!bd || bd->magic != DGNC_BOARD_MAGIC) How can these ever be true? > + return -1; > + > + if (bd->state != BOARD_READY) How can this be true? I recommend just removing the whole check. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel