Re: [PATCH] comedi: Change error return code for if statement in the function,cb_pcimdas_ai_rinsn

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25/02/15 21:37, Nicholas Krause wrote:


On February 25, 2015 1:03:14 PM EST, Hartley Sweeten <HartleyS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 9:13 PM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
This changes us using the incorrect error,-ETIMEOUT when checking if
the channel we are allocating to on the device structure pointer
passed
to this function is greater then the maximum available channels for
this
device to the correct error for a channel being out of range,-ECHRNG.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/cb_pcimdas.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/cb_pcimdas.c
b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/cb_pcimdas.c
index 70dd2c9..d91a6f3 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/cb_pcimdas.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/cb_pcimdas.c
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static int cb_pcimdas_ai_rinsn(struct
comedi_device *dev,
  		maxchans = s->n_chan;

  	if (chan > (maxchans - 1))
-		return -ETIMEDOUT;	/* *** Wrong error code. Fixme. */
+		return -ECHRNG;

  	/* configure for sw initiated read */
  	d = inb(devpriv->BADR3 + 5);

Hmm... This isn't quite right...

The 16 single-ended / 8 differential analog input channels on this
board is
set with a switch on the PCB. The state of the switch should be read
when
the driver is attached and the subdevice initialized with the correct
number
of channels. The core will then validate the "chan" number before
calling
the (*insn_read) operation.

Regards,
Hartley
Hartley,
If that is the case then why is the check  for max channels here.  I  can send in a v2 removing this check as it seems unneeded based on my understanding and your response to this patch.
Nick


The patch is fine, but now superceded by Hartley's series of patches which has more extensive changes to the driver:

http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/driverdev-devel/2015-February/065754.html

That set of patches assumes the switches remain in the same state through the lifetime of the device instance, which seems reasonable for a PCI card.

--
-=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd.    E-mail: <abbotti@xxxxxxxxx> )=-
-=(                          Web: http://www.mev.co.uk/  )=-
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux