RE: [PATCH v2 1/3] hv: hv_util: move vmbus_open() to a later place

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:40 AM, KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


 -----Original Message-----
 From: Jason Wang [mailto:jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx]
 Sent: Monday, February 2, 2015 7:38 PM
 To: KY Srinivasan
Cc: Dexuan Cui; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
 driverdev-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; olaf@xxxxxxxxx;
 apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx; Haiyang Zhang
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/3] hv: hv_util: move vmbus_open() to a later place On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:30 AM, KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 wrote:
 >
 >
 >>  -----Original Message-----
 >>  From: Jason Wang [mailto:jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx]
 >>  Sent: Monday, February 2, 2015 7:09 PM
 >>  To: Dexuan Cui
 >>  Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
 >> driverdev-
>> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; olaf@xxxxxxxxx; apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; KY
 >> Srinivasan; vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx; Haiyang Zhang
 >>  Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/3] hv: hv_util: move vmbus_open() to a
 >> later place
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >>  On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Dexuan Cui <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 >> wrote:
 >>  >>  -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Jason Wang [mailto:jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: Monday,
 >> February 2, 2015 17:36 PM  >>  To: Dexuan Cui  >>  Cc:
 >> gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;  >>
 >> driverdev-  >>  devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; olaf@xxxxxxxxx;
>> apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; KY >> Srinivasan; vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx; Haiyang >> Zhang >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] hv: hv_util: move vmbus_open() >> to a >> later place >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 12:35
 >> PM, Dexuan Cui <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  >> wrote:
 >>  >>  > Before the line vmbus_open() returns, srv->util_cb can be
>> already >> > running > and the variables, like util_fw_version, are
 >> needed by  >> the  > srv->util_cb.
 >>  >>
>> >> A questions is why we do this for util only? Can callbacks of
 >> other  >> devices be called before vmbus_open() returns?
>> > The variables are used in vmbus_prep_negotiate_resp(), which is
 >> only  > for the util devices.
 >>  >
>> > I think the other devices should already handle the similar issue
 >> > properly.
 >>  > If this is not the case, we need to fix them too.
 >>
 >>  Better to check all the others, e.g in balloon_probe(), it call
>> hv_set_drvdata() after vmbus_open() and dose several datas setups in >> the middle. If balloon_onchannelcallback() could be called before
 >> hv_set_drvdata(), the code looks wrong.
 >
 > Jason,
 >
> For all other device types, the guest initiates the communication with > the host and potentially negotiates appropriate (supported) version > with the host. For the services packaged in the util driver, the flow > is a little different - the host pushes the version information into > the guest. So, the fix Dexuan made is only needed in the util driver.
 >
 > Regards,
 >
 > K. Y
Thanks, so you mean for other device, it won't get any interrupt before guest
 negotiate the version with host?

Yes, the guest initiates the version negotiation. Are you seeing something different?

K. Y

No, thanks.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux