Re: [PATCH] staging: gdm72xx: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the function call "kfree"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 06:42:53PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 18:28:33 +0100
> 
> The kfree() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
> returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
> 
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/gdm72xx/gdm_wimax.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/gdm_wimax.c b/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/gdm_wimax.c
> index 9cab54b..ac901e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/gdm_wimax.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/gdm_wimax.c
> @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ static int gdm_wimax_close(struct net_device *dev)
>  
>  static void kdelete(void **buf)
>  {
> -	if (buf && *buf) {
> +	if (buf) {
>  		kfree(*buf);
>  		*buf = NULL;
>  	}

Instead we should delete this function and have the driver use the
"correct" kfree calls instead, right?  That extra setting the buffer to
NULL is a waste for most of these calls.

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux