2015-01-29 3:37 GMT+01:00 Chris Rorvick <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Rickard Strandqvist
> <rickard_strandqvist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Variable ar assigned a value that is never used.
>> I have also removed all the code that thereby serves no purpose.
>
> Each of these changes adds a warning ...
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c b/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c
>> index eb178fc..b916fab 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c
>> @@ -2974,10 +2974,10 @@ static int nbu2ss_ep_fifo_status(struct usb_ep *_ep)
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&udc->lock, flags);
>>
>> if (ep->epnum == 0) {
>> - data = _nbu2ss_readl(&preg->EP0_LENGTH) & EP0_LDATA;
>> + _nbu2ss_readl(&preg->EP0_LENGTH) & EP0_LDATA;
>
> .../linux/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c:2977:36: warning: value
> computed is not used [-Wunused-value]
> _nbu2ss_readl(&preg->EP0_LENGTH) & EP0_LDATA;
> ^
>
>> } else {
>> - data = _nbu2ss_readl(&preg->EP_REGS[ep->epnum-1].EP_LEN_DCNT)
>> + _nbu2ss_readl(&preg->EP_REGS[ep->epnum-1].EP_LEN_DCNT)
>> & EPn_LDATA;
>
> .../linux/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c:2981:4: warning: value
> computed is not used [-Wunused-value]
> & EPn_LDATA;
> ^
>
>> }
>>
>> @@ -3264,12 +3264,11 @@ static void __init nbu2ss_drv_set_ep_info(
>> if (isdigit(name[2])) {
>>
>> long num;
>> - int res;
>> char tempbuf[2];
>>
>> tempbuf[0] = name[2];
>> tempbuf[1] = '\0';
>> - res = kstrtol(tempbuf, 16, &num);
>> + kstrtol(tempbuf, 16, &num);
>
> .../linux/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c:3271:3: warning:
> ignoring return value of ‘kstrtol’, declared with attribute
> warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
> kstrtol(tempbuf, 16, &num);
> ^
Hi
The first two were my fault, stupid of me to let the "& number" remain :(
The last one was more interesting, se below.
But I can not really see how any error should be handled here?
Proposal to change to:
if (kstrtol(tempbuf, 16, &num) == 0 && num == 0)
static inline int __must_check kstrtol(const char *s, unsigned int
base, long *res);
"The __must_check annotation makes use of the gcc warn_unused_result
attribute; it first found its way into the mainline in 2.6.8. If a
function is marked __must_check, the compiler will issue a strong
warning whenever the function is called and its return code is unused.
"
Kind regards
Rickard Strandqvist
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
