Re: [PATCH v3] staging: lustre: fix sparse warning on LPROC_SEQ_FOPS macros

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Greg,

On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 04:02:22PM +0900, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:41:44PM -0800, Tristan Lelong wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> > 
> > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 03:28:27PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > 
> > > I took your v2 version, please send me the difference as this is a
> > > mess...
> > 
> > Not sure I understand what you meant here. 
> > Do you want me to submit a new patch that contains only the differences between v2 and v3?
> 
> Yes please.  Make it against the tree you got the email saying when your
> v2 patch was accepted.
> 

Just for reference, I submitted this patch as a new patch "[PATCH] staging: lustre: remove kmalloc from fld_proc_hash_seq_write"
I figured out it might trigger some more comments, and didn't want to add to the confusion.
Let me know if this is the right way, or if you would prefer an answer to email with the updated patch.

Regards
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux