On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, 敬锐 wrote:
>
> On 01/18/2015 08:20 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> +static int rts524a_optimize_phy(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr)
> >> >+{
> >> >+ int err;
> >> >+
> >> >+ err = rtsx_pci_write_register(pcr, RTS524A_PM_CTRL3,
> >> >+ D3_DELINK_MODE_EN, 0x00);
> >> >+ if (err < 0)
> >> >+ return err;
> > if (err)
> >
> err value will never be positive, but I have to make it consistence
> with driver in other place, because all the check using if (err < 0) form.
Then all of them should be changed.
> And maybe, it make reserved for future the function may return positive
> value.
I'd prefer not to live in the world of 'what if'. I think only
checking for a less than zero error value insinuates that a greater
than zero return is acceptable, but in this case is it not.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
