On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:18:40PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:54:27AM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 09:58:17PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:53:12AM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > > > > > > any reason why this return was removed ? > > > > > > Because it's not needed. > > > > yes, it is not needed. but the way Emrys Bayliss has changed the code, then we will get a compiler warning about no return statement. > i should have mentioned in my last mail that compiler will give waring if we compile with W=3 > 1) Your compiler is crap. 2) You should ignore obviously incorrect warnings. I'm using GCC 4.7.2 and it doesn't give a warning for this. W=3 gives a million other totally worthless warnings though. W=3 is not useful. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
