On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 03:33:01PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > > 2015-01-11 15:27 GMT-06:00 Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 03:12:15PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > Fixed a typo in nvec.c file > > > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Where are patches 1/3 and 2/3? > > > There are no such patches. > I don't know why it is generating such label instead of just [PATCH]. How did you generate the patch? > I updated my main Makefile and generated a local patch, could this be the > reason? I don't know. > Should I modified that label to be just [PATCH]? If you are sending 2 patches, they should be in order, with numbering. greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
