On Tue 2015-01-06 14:13:37, atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Add documentation under drivers/staging for new fpga manager's > sysfs interface. > > Signed-off-by: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v5 : (actually second version, but keeping version numbers > aligned with rest of patch series) > Move document to drivers/staging/fpga/Documentation/ABI > > v6 : No change in this patch for v6 of the patch set > > v7 : No change in this patch for v7 of the patch set > > v8 : No change in this patch for v8 of the patch set > --- > .../Documentation/ABI/sysfs-class-fpga-manager | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/staging/fpga/Documentation/ABI/sysfs-class-fpga-manager > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/fpga/Documentation/ABI/sysfs-class-fpga-manager b/drivers/staging/fpga/Documentation/ABI/sysfs-class-fpga-manager > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..eb600f2 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/staging/fpga/Documentation/ABI/sysfs-class-fpga-manager > @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ > +What: /sys/class/fpga_manager/<fpga>/name > +Date: October 2014 > +KernelVersion: 3.18 > +Contact: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > +Description: Name of low level driver. > + > +What: /sys/class/fpga_manager/<fpga>/firmware > +Date: October 2014 > +KernelVersion: 3.18 > +Contact: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > +Description: Name of the FPGA image file to load using firmware > class. This one is ugly: it unneccessarily passes firmware name through the kernel. Just make interface and code simpler by always passing "socfpga-fpga-image" or something like that. Thanks, Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
