On 21 December 2014 at 18:57, Jason Cooper <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Mathieu,
>
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 05:09:48PM -0700, mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Fixing errors related to the usage of do {} while (0) loop
>> in single statement macros, trailing semicolon in macros and
>> trailing whitespace.
>
> Huh. iirc, I added those do {} while(0)s to keep checkpatch happy.
> Either it's gotten smarter, or something is off.
Checkpatch apparently changed it's mind.
>
> At any rate, the whole macro menagerie in here concerns me a bit and I'm
> reluctant to change it until I have some time to refresh my memory on
> what this code is doing.
>
> It would be helpful if you could give scripts/objdiff a try on the
> before and after effects of your patch. If the object code doesn't
> change, then we can be more confident that the patch is just style
> changes. Please also check when SKEIN_UNROLL_* is set/unset.
You got it.
>
> I really should put the patch series together to move this driver out of
> staging. Then maybe folks will stop running checkpatch against it :-)
>
> thx,
>
> Jason.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
