Sorry! extremely stupid. Sending new patch immediately.
Kind regards
Rickard Strandqvist
2014-12-14 23:39 GMT+01:00 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 11:36:22PM +0100, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
>> There is otherwise a risk of a possible null pointer dereference.
>>
>> Was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> .../lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c | 20 +++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
>> index 61e04af..4a7891a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
>> @@ -1897,17 +1897,15 @@ int lprocfs_write_frac_u64_helper(const char *buffer, unsigned long count,
>> }
>>
>> units = 1;
>> - switch (*end) {
>> - case 'p': case 'P':
>> - units <<= 10;
>> - case 't': case 'T':
>> - units <<= 10;
>> - case 'g': case 'G':
>> - units <<= 10;
>> - case 'm': case 'M':
>> - units <<= 10;
>> - case 'k': case 'K':
>> - units <<= 10;
>> + if (end) {
>> + switch (*end) {
>> + case 'p': case 'P':
>> + case 't': case 'T':
>> + case 'g': case 'G':
>> + case 'm': case 'M':
>> + case 'k': case 'K':
>> + units <<= 10;
>> + }
>
> You know you just changed the logic in the code, right?
>
> Why? Have you tested this?
>
> greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
