Loic,
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 05:29:26PM +0100, Loic Pefferkorn wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The convention for checking for NULL pointers is !ptr and not ptr == NULL.
> This patch fixes such occurences in goldfish driver, it applies against next-20141212
>
Whose convention is this? I can't find any mention in
Documention/CodingStyle. checkpatch.pl doesn't complain about them.
And there are almost three thousand examples in staging which don't
use this convention.
linux-next$ grep -r "== NULL" drivers/staging/* | wc -l
2844
>
> Signed-off-by: Loic Pefferkorn <loic@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/goldfish/goldfish_audio.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/staging/goldfish/goldfish_nand.c | 10 +++++-----
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/goldfish/goldfish_audio.c b/drivers/staging/goldfish/goldfish_audio.c
> index f200359..7ab034b 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/goldfish/goldfish_audio.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/goldfish/goldfish_audio.c
> @@ -273,19 +273,19 @@ static int goldfish_audio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dma_addr_t buf_addr;
>
> data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (data == NULL)
> + if (!data)
> return -ENOMEM;
> spin_lock_init(&data->lock);
> init_waitqueue_head(&data->wait);
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
>
> r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> - if (r == NULL) {
> + if (!r) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "platform_get_resource failed\n");
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> data->reg_base = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, r->start, PAGE_SIZE);
> - if (data->reg_base == NULL)
> + if (!data->reg_base)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
[...]
--
- Jeremiah Mahler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
