Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix sparse warnings related to lock context imbalance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> >>> Don't hide "implementation of locks" in functions like this, it only
> >>> causes problems.  This code has layers of layers of layers of
> >>> abstractions due to it wanting to be originally ported to other
> >>> operating systems and lots of different kernel versions of Linux itself.
> >>> Unwinding and removing those layers is a good thing to do, don't paper
> >>> over the nonsense by putting sparse markings on pointless functions.
> >>> 
> >>> thanks,
> >>> 
> >>> greg k-h
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Cheers, Andreas
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Thanks for your answer. The annotations look like the best thing to do?
> 
> Yes, the annotations still make sense.
> 
> Cheers, Andreas

Hello guys,

I believe this patch is still relevant, and can be applied against next-20141212.

-- 
Cheers,
Loïc

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux