On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:14:06PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 07:57:06AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > And the reason I got confused was because you didn't label your second > > set of patches "v2", which it was, I saw two separate series, one with a > > few patches, and then 2 sets of 9, the second set labeled "v2" so I > > thought they were independant. Please think of the poor maintainer who > > has to decipher things like this when you send them out... > > For Mariusz's defense, this was his first batch. He didn't feel comfortable > and asked me how to proceed when sending a series and I forgot to warn him > about the "v2" as initially I didn't think there would be a v2, and after I > obviously forgot I didn't speak about that. So I share some responsibility > for this one. I wasn't trying to make anyone feel bad here, just trying to explain why I got this all messed up on my end. Mariusz, consider this a chance to learn how to rebase your patches, a very common task for kernel developers to have to do :) thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
