> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 18:50 PM
> To: Dexuan Cui
> Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; driverdev-
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; olaf@xxxxxxxxx; apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx; Haiyang Zhang
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools: hv: ignore ENOBUFS in the KVP daemon
>
> Dexuan Cui writes:
>
> > Under high memory pressure and very high KVP R/W test pressure, the
> netlink
> > recvfrom() may transiently return ENOBUFS to the daemon -- we found
> this
> > during a 2-week stress test.
> >
> > We'd better not terminate the daemon on this failure, because a typical
> KVP
> > user can re-try the R/W and hopefully it will succeed next time.
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/hv/hv_kvp_daemon.c b/tools/hv/hv_kvp_daemon.c
> > index 22b0764..9f4b303 100644
> > --- a/tools/hv/hv_kvp_daemon.c
> > +++ b/tools/hv/hv_kvp_daemon.c
> > @@ -1559,8 +1559,15 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > addr_p, &addr_l);
> >
> > if (len < 0) {
> > + int saved_errno = errno;
> > syslog(LOG_ERR, "recvfrom failed; pid:%u
> error:%d %s",
> > addr.nl_pid, errno, strerror(errno));
> > +
> > + if (saved_errno == ENOBUFS) {
>
> is it possible to meet EAGAIN (or EWOULDBLOCK) here as well? I'd suggest
> we ignore these as well in such case. Ignoring ENOMEM here is doubtful,
> I think. But possible.
>
> Vitaly
I don't think EAGAIN is possible because "man recvfrom" says
"If no messages are available at the socket, the receive calls wait for a
message to arrive, unless the socket is nonblocking (see fcntl(2)), in which
case the value -1 is returned and the external variable errno is set to
EAGAIN or EWOULDBLOCK".
The same man page mention ENOMEM for recvmsg(), but not recvfrom().
-- Dexuan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
