Re: Why does ion_cma_allocate need GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_ZERO flags?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




2014-11-14 오전 10:24에 Laura Abbott 이(가) 쓴 글:
> On 11/12/2014 11:18 PM, Gioh Kim wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm wondering why dma_alloc_coherent needs GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_ZERO flags in ion_cma_allocate().
>>
>> I think dma_alloc_coherent can go to __dma_alloc if the system has CMA area.
>> If __GFP_WAIT flag is set, it allocates memory from atomic pool.
>> So I think calling dma_alloc_coherent with __GFP_WAIT is enough.
>>
>> And can I get zero-filled-memory from CMA if I set __GFP_ZERO?
>>
>>
> 
> If we are actually using CMA, the GFP flags don't make much of a difference. If
> we didn't have CMA, using GFP_HIGHUSER would still be appropriate. The memory
> is going to userspace so the user part is necessary and there should be no need
> for a lowmem mapping so highmem can be used. __GFP_ZERO might be redundant since
> the dma layer zeros memory anyway but it's probably safe.

If cma-heap can be created even-if the system doesn't have CMA area, you're right.

But I think cma-heap should be created only if the system has CMA area.
I think, in no CMA system, cma-heap creation and/or allocation from cma-heap should be failed,
not allocate memory from lowmem or highmem as you say.

Thanks for your reply.

> 
> I think the flags should be fine as is.
> 
> Thanks,
> Laura
> 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux