On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 20:25:49 +0100 > > The functions kfree(), rtw_free_netdev() and vfree() test whether their > argument is NULL and then return immediately. Thus the test around the call > is not needed. > > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_efuse.c | 3 +-- > drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c | 3 +-- > drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c | 3 +-- > drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_xmit.c | 6 ++---- > drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/os_dep/usb_intf.c | 6 +++--- > 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_efuse.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_efuse.c > index 5b997b2..697876b 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_efuse.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_efuse.c > @@ -212,8 +212,7 @@ efuse_phymap_to_logical(u8 *phymap, u16 _offset, u16 _size_byte, u8 *pbuf) > exit: > kfree(efuseTbl); > > - if (eFuseWord) > - kfree(eFuseWord); > + kfree(eFuseWord); > } As far as I can tell, the 2/2 patch in this series proposes a completely different fix for this code. When you send a series, patch n+1/m is supposed to apply to the result of patch n/m. In any case, you can let this one go, because the problem has been fixed already. julia _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
